Ground Penetrating Radar
GRORADAR™ by Gary R. Olhoeft, PhD
Home ] Up ] GRORADAR ] Tutorial ] Links ] Reading ] Bibliography ] Educational Software ] GRORADAR Ground Penetrating Radar Gary R. Olhoeft ]

 

Introduction and History        Electromagnetic Wave Propagation

Velocity   Wavelength    Attenuation   Dispersion

Rocks, Soils and Fluids:  Electrical Properties    Magnetic Properties

Environmental Influences        Heterogeneity, Anisotropy and Scale       Radar Equation

Scattering     Polarization     Fresnel Reflection     Snell Angle       Stokes-Mueller Matrices      Poincare Sphere

Antennas     Coupling     Near / Far Fields     Waveguides   Multipathing     Resonance

Survey Design     Contrast     Geometry      Resolution     Depth of  Investigation     Orientation  

Noise

Interferences

[Under Construction]

Clutter

Metal

Side Scatter

Overhead Wires

Radiofrequency Noise

GPR Interference

    The following is an illustration of one portion of the problem. A GSSI 500 MHz center frequency (in air) short pulse antenna is setup in a 6 m by 6 m by 3 m high underground room without walls in the interior of a large building. This is done to reduce the signal levels from the cell repeaters to an analog cell phone to investigate the interference both ways between the cell phone and the radar system. With the radar off, the cell phone indicates a signal strength in the room about 1/6 of that outside the building, and has no trouble obtaining service. With the radar on and the antenna properly coupled to the linoleum tile covered concrete floor, the cell phone can not acquire service within about 1 m of the radar antenna, but once having acquired service outside that range, has no trouble keeping it right up to the cell phone touching the antenna. There is no noticable change in the quality of the conversation up to contact. Note that the cell phone is operating at a frequency near 900 MHz and the radar antenna coupled to the concrete has a -3dB bandwidth of roughly 300 to 700 MHz. With the radar operating and the antenna stationary, the data in the figure below are obtained. On the left the cell phone is on, obtaining service, but not being used (in standby). On the right, the cell phone is turned off. In the middle, the cell phone is being used to communicate a voice conversation. The data at the position of the horizontal line across the bottom of the image are plotted across the top of the figure, clearly showing the change in noise amplitude levels with cell phone operation.  Under the conditions on the right, the radar can map the thickness of the concrete, see the rebar in the concrete, and see the sewer pipe beneath the floor. On the left, the radiofrequency noise masks the sewer pipe so it cannot be found. In the middle, the active cell phone conversation makes rebar detection marginal and concrete thickness determination is not possible.

wpe3.jpg (53558 bytes)

Logistical Constraints

Data Acquisition   Data Processing   Modeling   Interpretation   Uncertainty

Applications:     Noninvasive Surface     Borehole      Airborne     Satellite and Space  

GPR Bibliography


This web site is supported by sales of
GRORADAR™ data acquisition, processing, modeling and display software.
Send mail to golhoeft@g-p-r.com with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 1998-2000 Gary R. Olhoeft. All rights reserved.  Last modified: June 01, 2000.
All trademarks are owned by their respective companies. Copyright & Fair Use  Electronic Frontier Foundation
Please don't copy and redistribute anything without requesting permission.
Do freely make hyperlinks to these web pages through http://www.g-p-r.com